princess buttercup and westley beginning

Much about it is rooted in the dated standards of its times and, thus, is ripe for reimagination. In the case of “The Princess Bride,” which is based on William Goldman’s adaptation of his own novel, I’d say that the door is wide open-not least because it’s far from a perfect movie. That’s why I’d like to make a modest proposal to the film industry in response to the “Princess Bride” outcry: namely, remake everything, or, at least, anything, and see whether a filmmaker, a screenwriter, a producer, and a group of actors have the insight and the imagination to meet the challenges and the inspirations of the classics. They are wrong, of course, but their critical delusions don’t prevent anyone from enjoying the originals. There are people who think that Jim McBride’s 1983 remake of “Breathless” is better than the original some viewers find Brian De Palma’s 1983 “Scarface” superior to Howard Hawks’s 1932 version. It seems self-evident that no film is literally damaged by a remake-and that if any damage results it’s of a psychological, not a cinematic, nature.

Among the most over-the-top of the fretters, for instance, was the movie’s co-star Cary Elwes, who tweeted this riff on one of the movie’s famous lines: “There’s a shortage of perfect movies in this world. Judging by the outcry from Hollywood stars over a Sony executive’s vaguely floated notion this week of remaking “The Princess Bride,” you’d think that the idea wasn’t to make a new film but to alter or destroy Rob Reiner’s 1987 original.

Princess buttercup and westley beginning